Blake Lively Legal War sparkle Candace Owens Showdown

A new wave of summons has caused headlines, but Owens is silent.

Her answer has only added more fuel to the already burning Hollywood scandal.

The rumors whirled that Owens, along with Perez Hilton and YouTuber Andy Signore, was announced as alive and Baldoni’s lawsuit was exacerbated.

These personalities have openly discussed legal hatred on their platforms when Signore claimed that Livly “defeats” in an invisible way “after she had overturned her emotional suffering.

However, Owens is called invalid. She told Everyday mail“Given the fact that I have not yet received any court summons, I appreciate Blake’s team Tmz To warn me about it. “

She added, “And of course, I have no idea what I have told me because I knew any of these parties when their respective lawsuits were submitted. But I follow and I will announce to the audience during my application!”

Despite a legitimate victory, when Baldoni was thrown at $ 400 million for defamation, Livly has not diminished for its case.

She has continued to send summons, cause criticism and lift her eyebrows.

Livs stated that the spokesman: “After all, the court of Baldoni’s shaky lawsuit was a complete victory.”

However, the name of the Candace Owens, related to the case, has worried about the Lively Strategy.

Although the Baldoni meter was rejected, his lawyer Brian Freitman insisted that “the court’s decision on the initiation of dismissal in any case does not affect the truth that there is no harassment and no smear campaigns, which in no way affects our energetic protection against Lively.”

He continued, “The discovery is going on, and we are confident that we will dominate these virtually unjustified accusations. Instead of reviewing existing requirements, our customers will use additional legitimate opportunities.”

In contrast, Livly’s team declared dismissal as an excuse.

Her lawyers stated: “Today’s opinion is a complete victory and a complete justification of Blake Livly, as well as those Justin Baldoni and Wayfarer parties pulled her to her countermeasures, including Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane and The New York Times.”

They continued, “As we said from the first day, this” $ 400 million “lawsuit was stunning, and the court saw it through it. We look forward to the next round looking for lawyers’ fees, triple losses and penalties against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan, and other knee joints that committed this malicious litigation.

Decide New York Times The spokesman said for the dismissal: “We are grateful to the court for seeing the lawsuit against The New York Times for what it was: a powerless attempt to suppress fair reporting.”

They added: “Our journalists went out and carefully and quite gave a major story to the public, and the court found that the law was intended to protect only this type of journalism. We will continue to stand in court for our journalism and our journalists when their work was attacked.”

Legal drama began with a cheerful accusation of Baldon for sexual harassment and countermeasures to smear campaign.

In response, Baldoni now submitted to the counter, claiming defamation, civil extortion and interference in his role as “it ends with us”. He also launched thelawsuitinfo.com, publishing private communications between him and Lively.

Although the court was alive, deciding that Baldoni’s demands lack the merit, his team claims otherwise. They say the documents give a clear idea of ​​the attempt of sabotage.