The UN Supreme Court with a historical idea on climate change Wednesday, the decision that can pay for the action around the universe for the climate crisis, a legal measure.
After the years of the lobby by the weak islands that are afraid of the International Court, the General Assembly of the International Court asked for the consultant, but not attachment for international responsibilities.
Panel 15 Judges was assigned to answer two questions. First, What countries are forced to do under international law to protect climate and environment from Greathouse Gas Opissions? Second, when their actions, or lack of action, have the legal results of government, or the absence of action, seriously damaging the climate and environment?
“The stars were unable to greater. Arnold Kiel loughman,” Arnold Kiel Loughman, said the General Association of Vanuatu Island in December.
In decades until 2023, the sea levels rose by the universal average about 4.3 centimeter (1.7 inches), with high pacific pacific parts. The world warmed 1.3 degrees Celsius (2.3 Fahrenheit) due to burning fossil fossils (2.3 Fahrenheit).
Get the new national news
Daily New, political, economic and economic news and now get their headings, on the day one day has been submitted to your inbox once a day.
Vanuatu is one of the group of small countries that flows into the climate crisis in the climate crisis but it affects many islands a passphrop.
“The contracts made at the international levels are roughly run between the states,” Ralph Regenvendan, Minister of Ralph Regeu, a Minister of Vanuatu told the press to change climate change.
Each decision will be non-binding advice by Hague-Based Court and can’t force the rich nations to help the countries of struggle. Yet it will be more powerful than a symbol, because it can also serve internal cases within the basis of other legal acts.
“What is this important issue to deal with the action of climate activity.
Activists can bring the laws against their countries to not be able to return to the international court court with the decision and the state. And everything that the judges say that the cowards as the basis of other legal devices, chowdhury said.
The United States and Russia, both large petroleum-produced states, are against margining margor manduras.
Only the court has a view that is the most recent in the Legal Greens in a series of legal success. Before this month, the Human Rights Court found that the country have a legal responsibility not only to harm the environmental environment but to protect ecosystems. Last year, the European Court of Human Rights decided to protect countries from the results of a better climate change.
In 2019, the Holland Court for air activists have been rewarded for the first weather activists from the potential impact from the equivalent effects of climate and the government is to protect its citizens.
& Copy 2025 Canada Press
