Deep Blue Sea proves that the test audience can arrange things


Near Drew Dietsch
| Published

The test audience has become something of a contemporary film discourse Boogeyman. The entertainment report is continued thanks to predators that will try to turn everything in the corpse to choose. Using studio tent productions that are made in a more fanatical test and interrogation than ever, the knowledge of test screening becomes a planned part of the muckraking cycle. If the media can even find a teenage worm to bait on the hook when it comes to early test screening, they throw it in the ocean and the fish always bite.

The real threatening test audience and the narrative created around them is their representation as the worst/stupid/weak most selected possible people that affect the final cut. As such, it is rare if you hear a lot of stories about test screenings that make huge changes that make the movie better. More often, it is to beat by refraining from “Test screenings ruined the movie!” From ordinary critics who know nothing about the film business.

While there are undeniably examples of how the test audience changes the movie to the worst, the movie I always mean when I started to rethink the test sessions Deep blue seaAn example of which the test audience was 100% right.

Deep the original end of the blue sea

I’m not here to collect movies that everyone should have seen at this stage of their lives. So, either you are someone with good taste and you know who Deep blue sea There is, or you can go to read the Wikipedia page if you need a big storyline and you need to know what the characters are. Just because I do not exclude every possible reader, you are probably also drooling moron. In this case, go to use some wrong pieces, anti-articles meant only dull, hackers and authoritarian bullets.

Important to know that at the initial end Deep blue seaDr. Susan Mcalester (Saffron Burrows) survived and helped kill the last shark. Not only did she have a romantic structure with Carter Blake (Thomas Jane) in the entire film, culminating in those ending with a movie with the upcoming kiss on the screen.

And the test audience hated it.

Test audiences change the deep blue sea end

Several comment cards from Deep blue sea The inspection audience mentioned how much they enjoyed the film, except for the final resolution with Macalester. Her position in the story as a collaborator. Frankenstein Along with Dr. Jim Vitlok (Stellan Skarsgård) was blamed for the plot events. Since Jim is removed at the beginning of his action, Susan is left as the only culprit in the audience’s eyes.

Frankly, this is the right call to a particular story Deep blue sea tells with Susan. Susan is depicted as directed to succeed, no matter what ethical boundaries she has to break. Although she supports her ambitions with an empathetic back story, she does not justify the actions she takes, leading to the death of her colleagues. Seeing how she gets a full happy ending at the end of the movie, it seems like a false redemption we only see in the movies.

So, with convincing negative answers to the original end from the test audience, the studio got cash to restore Deep blue sea finally and kill Macalester. And you know what? Her character is much better ending! She sacrifice herself so that the last survivors can kill her creation before escaping and changing the ecosystem forever. It still manages to give her a salvation circle without touching as a hollow, shallow or unearned.

The inspection audience gets a lot of flak these days. I’m not saying all this is undeserved, but I want people to remember that they do not always make your precious corporate product worse. Deep blue sea is one of the biggest test screening arguments; No one involved in the film saw the bad direction they had done with the character and their end. So, thanks, Deep blue sea Test audience. You made one of my favorite movies even better before I ever knew it.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *